Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Art? by Neeeksy Art? by Neeeksy
Hmm.
Add a Comment:
 
:icontaakevegg:
Taakevegg Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2013   Traditional Artist
If you wank to it, it's not art.
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Im sure some people have wanked looking at the Mona Lisa.....but yea I tend to agree.
Reply
:icondraconblixx:
DraconBlixx Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Student Filmographer
No! This isn't a straight vagina shot!
Reply
:iconboomboxkitty:
Boomboxkitty Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Student General Artist
(how in the world do you get art up so fast XD ) i agree completely :) as we have discussed of lately xD This is great by the way
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
I dont know ha
and thank you :)
Reply
:iconblue-fires:
Blue-Fires Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
THANK YOU! Thought I was the only person on dA who felt the art-less nudity was on the wrong site. Artistic nudity or images put up for anatomical help are great, but I don't wanna see spread bum cheeks and close ups of...other bits every time I go on the dA homepage. Both the natural male and female form are beautiful and should be celebrated as such but the line between creating art and attention-seeking has become blurred and thin.
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Your last line is perfect :)
Reply
:iconblue-fires:
Blue-Fires Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
I have my moments ha
Reply
:iconthepumpkin-queen:
thepumpkin-queen Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
AH-GREED. Thank you. :heart:
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Your welcome ha :)
Reply
:iconwild-wallflower:
wild-wallflower Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
i'm all for artistic nudity done properly but for me if it isn't portraying some serious emotive meaning through other elements as well as nudity there's no reason for bush and it cheapens the girl and the picture but on that same note there is something profoundly beautiful about the female form at its base so i get drawings and paintings and such of the female form (that actually requires more talent than taking a candid photograph) like grandma always said there's something profoundly attractive about a little bit of mystery so don't cheapen yourself for attention.
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Very well written.
What do you think about the male form then, just as beautiful?
Reply
:iconwild-wallflower:
wild-wallflower Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
well it can be but it depends for me. some greased up hairless gym monkey with orange skin no lol i think it applies for both male and female form (imo)natural and realistic is best captured tastefully and even if naked not baring all for the sake of being naked. but just a straight up picture of dong lol that's just raunchy
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Again I pretty much agree with all of that.
Reply
:iconwild-wallflower:
wild-wallflower Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
:D
Reply
:iconpastrytaster135:
pastrytaster135 Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I think it depends. . . . For example, you've got artists like Slawa (I love her by the way. . .lmao) who do poses that are somewhat cliche and showy, but she's always got a concept attatched to it. And then you have the token girls on here with crappy cellphone camera photos of themselves naked, no real concept, just pure attention whore-ness. . .and THEN you have the people who have pictures that seem legit, but you can tell that there's probably no art or concept behind it at all. . . .AND THEN you have the other people that just feel that their body is a canvas and they feel that the love that they have for their body should be shared. . .see, there's sooooo many categories of people who do this when in actuality THERE SHOULD ONLY BE ONE! DX lmao
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Pretty spot on ha.
Reply
:iconpastrytaster135:
pastrytaster135 Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
If only there was just one category. . . .DAMN YOU, INTERNET! DX lol
Reply
:iconpastrytaster135:
pastrytaster135 Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I think it depends. . . . For example, you've got artists like Slawa (I love her by the way. . .lmao) who do poses that are somewhat cliche and showy, but she's always got a concept attatched to it. And then you have the token girls on here with crappy cellphone camera photos of themselves naked, no real concept, just pure attention whore-ness. . .and THEN you have the people who have pictures that seem legit, but you can tell that there's probably no art or concept behind it at all. . . .AND THEN you have the other people that just feel that their body is a canvas and they feel that the love that they have for their body should be shared. . .see, there's sooooo many categories of people who do this when in actuality THERE SHOULD ONLY BE ONE! DX lmao
Reply
:iconitololo:
Itololo Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
hey! it's what i thought about two days ago!
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Great minds :)
Reply
:icondefiantradiance:
DefiantRadiance Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
I sat up too fast and scared the hell out of the damn bird lol, I don't consider ' Nude Art' as art, but there is some that actually looks like art, like sculptures and paintings, but the photography? It's like that same this you'd find in a man magazine that they hide under their mattresses. How about your explain opinion Mister Neeks? :P
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Ha poor bird.
Hmmm it depends really, I think the human body is beautiful obviously so it can be classed as art but depends on the nature of the pose or reasoning behind the photo being taken in the first place.
Reply
:icondefiantradiance:
DefiantRadiance Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
:P Exactly my thoughts, We're soooo telepathic? Is that what it's called? I forgot already! >.<
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Yes thats the right word ha
Reply
:icondefiantradiance:
DefiantRadiance Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013
Woot woot raise the roof :P
Reply
:iconshamdaddy:
ShamDaddy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
Yes. Yes, it is. She doesn't have her legs spread open with her fingers inside of an orefice.
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
She has a Aubergine stuffed up there though :(
Reply
:iconshamdaddy:
ShamDaddy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
Wait... what? Then, no...
Reply
:iconneeeksy:
Neeeksy Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Haha
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
February 19, 2013
Image Size
227 KB
Resolution
500×750
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
502
Favourites
12 (who?)
Comments
30
Downloads
5
×